JAMAAT-E-ISLAMI & GENERAL ELECTION 2009

first i start with an over view of jamaa-athe islami's policy on 2009's general election in kerala.jamaa-ath voted 18/20 LDF candidates& 2/20 UDF candidates in kerala.because... jamaa-ath says....(1) more left front MPs needs in parliament as powerfull force against pro-amarican pro-israel policies & hindu fascist forces.
(2) at the same time more powerfull muslim candidates also needed. so jamaa-ath voted for 2 muslim UDF candidates in wayanad(congress) &ponnani(muslim league).
(see kerala ameer's interviews in madhyamam daily-09april3& probodhanam weekly)
COMMENT: jamaa-ath's general position is vote &strengthen LEFT.they deviate from this position for the (2)nd reason.but the opposite LDF candidates in wayanad&ponnani also muslim candidates.then why they did not vote them.are they not power full candidate for minoruity's interests? congress candidates in wayanad M ISHANAVAS supports all congress's pro-israel policies & pro-american neuclear treaty .then how he will be powerfull muslim? Ameer says jamaa-ath will support UPA candidates only in UPA-NDA face to face contesting constituencies. in these 2 constituencies there was not such a condition.
in ponnani they votedETMohamed basheer(Muslm league).in last assembly election jamaa-ath did not vote basheer.then was he not powerfull muslim& not qualified candidate beingMLA?how ET became qualified candidate to parliament within two years?is it better a candidate being LEFT & muslim than muslim candidates supporting anti muslim policies?
ET like kunjalikkutty was not ready to quit UDF cabinet when babri masjid demolished.can we expect now ideal& courageouos action from league leaders?remember one thing.Basheer did not give any promise to voters he will oppose UPA's so called policies.he did not say at least one word against neuclear treaty & pro israel policies.
THEN WHY JAMAA-ATH DID NOT VOTE Husain Randathani & Rahmathulla?(continues)